Advanced search

ARCHIVE SUMMARY


Total entries: 112

View by Date

View by Category

ARCHIVES

January 2010
September 2009
July 2009
April 2009
March 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
October 2006
September 2006
July 2006
February 2006
January 2006
August 2005
July 2005
January 2005
June 2004

CATAGORIES

911 & the Arts
911 Activism
911 Commission
911 Conferences & Events
911 Eyewitness
911 Family Members
911 First Responders
911 Follow the Money
911 Initiatives
911 Investigation
911 Science
911 Web Video
911 Whistleblowers
Antiwar
CIA - FBI Abuses
Corporate Media Control
Deep Politics - Oligarchy
Destruction of Civil Liberties
Election Fraud
Fake "War on Terror"
False Flag Terrorism
Impeachment
Military Industrial Complex
Net Neutrality - Internet Blocking
Pharma-Medical Complex
Privatized Military
<April 2009 >
S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    
XML

Powered by pMachine

David Ray Griffin Lecture
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
7:00 PM
Howe Library
13 South Street
Hanover, NH USA

Friday, May 7, 2010
7:00 PM
Auerbach Auditorium -
Hillyer Hall,
University of Hartford
Bloomfield Avenue
West Hartford, CT USA

Saturday, May 8, 2010
7:00 PM
Harvard Epworth
Methodist Church
1555 Massachuesetts Ave., Cambridge, MA USA

For more events see:
911Truth.org

The 9/11 Commission Rejects own Report as Based on Government Lies
by Gordon Duff
http://www.salem-news.com
(CINCINNATI, Ohio) - In John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11”,
the author builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version... is almost entirely untrue...

From Amazon Books review: ..."The conclusion to be drawn is that the Commission's report is unreliable and, therefore, that we do not have the truth about 9/11. That this conclusion comes from the legal counsel to the Commission is compelling evidence that a new investigation is required."
Paul Craig Roberts

Truth and Justice Radio Show interview with David Ray Griffin Click Here for Recorded Show from Sunday, March 29, 8:30 AM


FealGood Foundation
GrearUp Foundation

Mon Apr 06, 2009

Study: 'highly engineered explosive' found in WTC rubble

Raw Story Full article with links

04/04/2009
Filed by Stephen C. Webster

A team of scientists claim to have unearthed startling data from dust and debris gathered in the days and weeks after the World Trade Center towers collapsed on Sept. 11, 2001.

In a study published by the Open Chemical Physics Journal -- a peer-reviewed, scientific publication -- Steven E. Jones and Niels Harrit level a stark allegation: that within the dust and rubble of the World Trade Center towers lays evidence of "a highly engineered explosive," contrary to all federal studies of the collapses.

"We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center," reads the paper's abstract. "One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)."

They claim their analysis has uncovered "active thermitic material": a combination of elemental aluminum and iron oxide in a form of thermite known as "nanostructured super-thermite."

Thermite, used in steel welding, fireworks shows, hand grenades and demolition, can produce a chemical reaction known for extremely high temperatures focused in a very small area for a short period of time.

According to the Navy's Small Business Innovation Research, super-thermite "is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), which controls the export and import of defense-related material and services."

"This finding really goes beyond anything that has previously been shown," said Jones in a media advisory. "We had to use sophisticated tools to analyze the dust because this isn't just a typical explosive, RDX or CD4 or something -- this is a highly engineered material not readily available to just anyone."

"The cost and production rate of super-thermite composites has limited the use of these materials in DoD applications," claims the Navy's SBIR.

Dr. Steven E. Jones, a former physicist at Brigham Young University and a founding member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, presented a paper in 2005 discussing alternatives to the government's theory that massive structural damage combined with burning jet fuel to weaken the towers' support infrastructure, causing a rapid "pancake" collapse.

###
Excerpt added by Boston 911 Truth:
Dr. Steven Jones - Boston 911 Conference
Full Presentation - 12/15/07.mov - 58 min - May 1, 2008
Chronos Films & Media - www.ChronosFilms.com

Dr. Steven Jones presents new evidence in the ongoing investigation of the collapse of the WTC Towers at the Boston 9/11 Conference (12/15/07). This is the complete presentation.



###

In September 2006, under heavy criticism in the media and by several colleagues, the university placed Jones on paid administrative leave and his paper was removed from the BYU database.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology, which investigated the WTC tower collapses, maintains there was no recovered evidence of explosive materials. An electronic FAQ to the government's theory is available online.

"We get a lot of calls from people who have heard these theories," NIST spokesman Michael Newman told Newsday. "But we conducted what was probably the most complex investigation of a building collapse in history."

"We based our conclusion on the talents of the world's best engineers and scientists, state of the art computer models and 236 pieces of steel recovered from the site," reads the NIST FAQ.

"The collapse of the WTC towers was not caused either by a conventional building fire or even solely by the concurrent multi-floor fires that day," NIST says. "Instead, NIST concluded that the WTC towers collapsed because: (1) the impact of the planes severed and damaged support columns, dislodged fireproofing insulation coating the steel floor trusses and steel columns, and widely dispersed jet fuel over multiple floors; and (2) the subsequent unusually large, jet-fuel ignited multi-floor fires weakened the now susceptible structural steel."

"No building in the United States has ever been subjected to the massive structural damage and concurrent multi-floor fires that the towers experienced on Sept. 11, 2001," the agency claims.

This latest report, Jones told Visibility 9/11, "explodes the official story that 'no evidence' exists for explosive/pyrotechnic materials in the WTC buildings. The red/gray chips are the 'loaded gun' of 9-11."

Raw Story Full article with links

Posted by: Boston 9/11 TRUTH on Apr 06, 09 | 3:03 pm | Profile

[0] Trackbacks   [0] Pingbacks

 Top